Final Review: EDC 102H Context Statement - Fall 2009
Author(s): Cara
Section Title: Shea Senior High School
Introduction - Score = 4/ 5 pts.
5 – Intro interestingly provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what community/district/school is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and whom the report is intended to inform.
4 - Intro names the community/district/school and previews the scope of the report, and may describe whom the report is intended to inform.
3 - Intro names the community/district/school but not much else.
2 - Intro fails to name the community/district/school.
0 - No introduction section is apparent.
Comments:
Read for typos.
Audience?
Organization Score = 5 / 5 pts.
5 - Report includes the following elements: introductory, concluding, and main-body paragraphs. Within each section (Community, District, or School) , paragraphs logically group the information presented.
4 - Report includes all of the elements mentioned previously, but may not break down information into logical paragraphs within each section.
3 – Report may be missing one element and/or information presented may be too wordy, too brief, logically inconsistent, or unclear
2 - Report is missing more than one report element.
0 - Report does not include any sections.
Comments:
Nice topic sentences for each paragraph.
Mechanics Score = 4/ 5 pts.
5 - All information in the report is cited using wikispaces footnotes. and There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
4 - Most information is cited using footnotes. There are a noticeable number of typos, misspellings, language conventions and/or usage errors.
3 - Some footnotes are missing or incomplete e.g. URLs are listed without the title of the website. and/or There are many typos, misspellings, or other language conventions/usage errors.
2 - Most of the report's information is not footnoted.
and/or
Language conventions/usage errors inhibit reader’s ability to comprehend parts of the report.
0 - Report does not include a Reference section.
and/or
Report is incoherent.
Comments:
NECAP paragraph w/ only one citation?
Conclusion Score = 4/ 5 pts.
5 - Conclusion reviews analysis of community, district, or school and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4 - Conclusion reviews analysis of community, district, or school.
3 - Conclusion minimally refers back to report findings.
2 - Conclusion is baseless.
0 - No conclusion section is apparent.
Comments:
There are new statements in the conclusion that could have been included earlier in the report.
If you're using the SALT reports to support your statements about how hard teachers are trying, then you should cite this source.
Creativity - Score = 5/ 5 pts.
5 - Report is written in an engaging style and features such as graphics or photographs that report's readability .
4 - Report has some interesting sections or written in an engaging style.
0 - 3 - Report generally reports information seemingly without purpose.
Comments:
Content/Thoroughness - Score = 13 /15 pts
15 - Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (community, district, or school) and compares each figure with another relevant figure with clarity and depth of analysis (e.g. earlier scores and state average) and states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards (School Report Card).
14 - Report includes at least eight different facts per section and compares most figures with relevant values with clarity and some depth of analysis and states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
13 - Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures, but the analysis is at times incomplete or unclear
12 - Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures; however, the analysis is incomplete or difficult to follow
10 - Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
What did you mean by a lack of accessibility in the demographics section?
Schol Safety: ... "comparably average to the states... What is state value?
You have one citation for the NECAP section, but it would be nice if you cited your source for the program changes you tell us about.
You state several times that Shea has suffered from budget cuts. It would be nice to illustrate that with data. Has the amount the district spends per students actually decreased over the past few years?
Final Review: EDC 102H Context Statement - Fall 2009
Author(s): Cara
Section Title: Shea Senior High School
Introduction - Score = 4/ 5 pts.
5 – Intro interestingly provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what community/district/school is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and whom the report is intended to inform.
4 - Intro names the community/district/school and previews the scope of the report, and may describe whom the report is intended to inform.
3 - Intro names the community/district/school but not much else.
2 - Intro fails to name the community/district/school.
0 - No introduction section is apparent.
Comments:
Organization Score = 5 / 5 pts.
Comments:
Mechanics Score = 4/ 5 pts.
5 - All information in the report is cited using wikispaces footnotes. and There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
4 - Most information is cited using footnotes. There are a noticeable number of typos, misspellings, language conventions and/or usage errors.
3 - Some footnotes are missing or incomplete e.g. URLs are listed without the title of the website. and/or There are many typos, misspellings, or other language conventions/usage errors.
2 - Most of the report's information is not footnoted.
and/or
Language conventions/usage errors inhibit reader’s ability to comprehend parts of the report.
0 - Report does not include a Reference section.
and/or
Report is incoherent.
Comments:
Conclusion Score = 4/ 5 pts.
5 - Conclusion reviews analysis of community, district, or school and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4 - Conclusion reviews analysis of community, district, or school.
3 - Conclusion minimally refers back to report findings.
2 - Conclusion is baseless.
0 - No conclusion section is apparent.
Comments:
Creativity - Score = 5/ 5 pts.
5 - Report is written in an engaging style and features such as graphics or photographs that report's readability .
4 - Report has some interesting sections or written in an engaging style.
0 - 3 - Report generally reports information seemingly without purpose.
Comments:
Content/Thoroughness - Score = 13 /15 pts
15 - Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (community, district, or school) and compares each figure with another relevant figure with clarity and depth of analysis (e.g. earlier scores and state average) and states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards (School Report Card).
14 - Report includes at least eight different facts per section and compares most figures with relevant values with clarity and some depth of analysis and states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
13 - Report includes at least six different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures, but the analysis is at times incomplete or unclear
12 - Report includes at least four different facts in each section and compares some of the figures to other relevant figures; however, the analysis is incomplete or difficult to follow
10 - Report includes less than four different facts for any section or fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Final Score for Section (on URITK) : 35 / 40 pts
Points for Publishing Section: _ / 10 pts
Peer Reviewer(s):
Total Points: 35_/50 pts=